Originally Posted by
BiTzSam
Arguments? The only argument- non plural is that you spent money on the guns. So what? I've already explained why that is not a reasoning against the guns being brought down to give lower tier- skilled gun users an advantage. The guns were too strong in comparison with the majority of the other guns in the game, if you say otherwise then you are simply biased because you bought them.
I'm in this position because I am unbiased. You can say 'there needs to be more people making the decisions' but guess what those people would also have to be unbiased and therefore the same conclusion will be reached.
I paid for most of the high tier guns such as bar, shipka, pbp myself. I didn't get those guns for free and yet I am willing to put aside the fact that I paid for them, be unbiased and balance them for the benefit of gameplay as a whole
- - - Updated - - -
I've explained multiple times why you can't nerf the 2 strongest guns and then leave the other guns. Doesn't take much common sense to see that if the 2 best guns are brought down, so do similar guns so that those guns don't just replace them as they'd become statistically better.
I've only ignored your suggestions if they were the same repetitive argument i've answered 100 times or if they were for biased reasonings such as you suggesting me ingame to buff the p2ks (and after looking at your account I happened to see that you had just reached 100k kills so suprise suprise why you would want those buffed now that you can buy them).
The only valid suggestion i've seen you make is the cripple cannon which I have already implemented by reducing its knockback potential from 50% to 10%
Reply With Quote