Yeah, I stole a stop sign, so many accidents after that... im going to hell lol.
Have you ever picked your nose?
Printable View
Yeah, I stole a stop sign, so many accidents after that... im going to hell lol.
Have you ever picked your nose?
Yes, of course.
What are your viewpoints on the rights of a paedophile?
Hmmm, well I believe pedophilia is an act of impurity, as such giving the rights that homosexuals have to pedophiles in terms of relationships is wrong. Especially since a pedophile is attracted to young children.
Have you ever gotten into a fight in school and you were never caught?
I believe paedophilia shouldn't be looked down upon if they are not actually acting upon themselves to do illegal things. If homosexuality is accepted, (generally the argument is that you can't decide what you're attracted to) then being a paedophile shouldn't be looked down upon.
Anyway, back on topic, yes I have been in a fight, I broke someone's nose when they scared me (just a reaction) and they brought it upon themselves to try to attack me later that week. In short, they were all crying like girls after they attempted to attack me. A teacher was watching, yet let me get off scot-free as they had it coming.
How would you explain a colour to a blind person?
no but i did eat a squirrel O.o
Have You Jump And Pretended You Could Fly?
- - - Updated - - -
oops. i would explain that it is a magical land
Your answer doesn't make sense.Quote:
Originally Posted by KnS
He makes $Quote:
Originally Posted by crd
How can a deer with a broken leg fly backwards to the moon in 3.5 hours on a tuesday afternoon off a garbage can in the sewers in NYC with a pony hanging on the handle of the can?
Huh? That gave me an aneurism.
Have you ever walked up to a person and straight up told them you are fugly
Not in those exact words.
Describe your views on what Edward Snowden did.
I believe the act that Edward Snowden committed was a just act, he informed the people that they were being spied on, that their own government monitored them. While what he did was positive towards the publics awareness, in some ways he may have hurt diplomatic relations between the US and other foreign countries which leads to negative effects. However overall his act did wake up citizens across the globe and in the US showing that all governments are corrupt and bend the rules at some point.
What are your views on homosexuality and marriage between like genders?
I believe homosexuality is wrong, although I don't disagree with people when they say it's fine.
This is because of the fact that you're supposed to reproduce, yet you can't with that of the same gender as you.
Although I do believe that they are also good, as the more homosexual people, the more orphans get taken in.
As homosexual people can't just have a baby, they plan for a baby, and I think that they give better care to them.
Marriage is not a problem.
What point of view do you take on discrimination against refugees?
I believe discrimination towards refugees is wrong, however I do understand where people come from. refugees may cause displacement in communities and can take away jobs from people native to the country. However people should keep in mind the pain and suffering refugees may sometimes go through, remember these people are escaping their native countries in order to find a safe haven from the dangers they leave behind. For example during the early 1900's and late 1800's Irish families were large targets to discriminate, because of the massive influx of Irish during this time period. They left their home due to famine and in turn found haven in the US, taking low wage jobs that required no skill. However these jobs were being taken away from the US citizens who may have also been desperate for money, losing the job because immigrants could be paid less for the same labor. As such people often refused to house the Irish and often gave them a hard time.
TLDR: Discrimination towards refugees or anyone in general is unacceptable in my opinion.
What are your views on Americas involvement in the middle east.
The American government has to have their finger in every pot, they just can't not get involved.
I believe they should back away, although they can't now.
They're going to end up making another war.
What is your opinion on America and it's 'freedom'?
While the United States does give its citizens more rights and freedoms compared to other countries, I feel that our freedoms at times arent very free at all. As a citizen of the United States myself I feel that the government finds ways to limit our freedoms as well infringe on them such was the issue that Snowden revealed to the public. However while our freedoms are in a sense regulated, we do have more of them than most other countries. Some countries for example still do not have suffrage for women, an area where this is prevalent is in the Middle East. If a woman spoke her mind in Iraq (for sake of argument) she may be stoned, beat, hit etc. however in the United States this does not occur because women do have suffrage.
TLDR: Americas Freedoms Is A Double Edged Sword, There Will Always Be Negatives To Counter The Positives Because No Government Is Perfect.
(Very tired sorry if this makes no sense bare with me lol)
What are your views on the continuing issue developing in Ukraine.
A very interesting question...I'm not sure what kind of info are you guys being fed up with in USA,but Russia has nothing to do with the current state of the Ukraine (the division of Ukraine onto 2 parts)
It's just that there is government and there is Donbass,the Novorossia,despite the fact that most of the Novorossian's citizens are UKRANIAN it was being attacked and it is still being attacked for a certain reason,despite the Minsk's agreements,all what they want is to be free,they don't want to be the part of Ukraine anymore,they just want to be free,they don't even care about joining Russia.
I remember how on US news they were saying that Russian terrorists were attacking Donetsk and Lugansk,like Russian terrorists were killing innocent people,despite the fact that there was too much proof of government's attacks.
Funny how everyone thinks that Novorossia mainly consists of Russian terrorists or some other bs,well no,they are Ukrainian,they are NOT terrorists and they have nothing to do with Russia.
There will never be peace between of them,even if there is gonna be an OFFICIAL peace between of them,even if they will successfully divide because the attacks won't stop,they just don't want to give away their lands.
The Minsk agreement has been broken like hundreds of times already,even citizens of Donbass don't believe in the peace anymore.
I might sound pretty childish but that is my opinion,now let me end this political stuff,it's a pointless argument that won't change anything,there is still corruption in the so called Ukrainian government,nothing shall change.
Do you love spicy food?
Yes spicy food is extremely good.
Have you ever wondered how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
Nope.
What do you think is preventing WWIII?
Peace lmao
Have you ever trolled someone with a fake bug/rat?
no, i have with a real one however.
What is your view on humans being euthanized
Well, I think human euthanism is a very very confusing phrase, of which i have no idea about.
Whats human euthanism?
humans being euthanized means being given an injection so that a person suffering/in pain can die peacefully without painQuote:
Originally Posted by Shadow7980
Can I answer the question?Quote:
Originally Posted by Psycho Adelphos
of course you mayQuote:
Originally Posted by crd
My opinion about euthanizing humans.
Some politicians take the stance that euthanizing humans is burke, although I feel like euthanization should become legal under strict procedures and guidelines.
Euthanizing gives people a way out from painful diseases, which are often as painful as being tortured.
It gives an option to end the suffering quickly, rather than prolonging it.
Like Tenzin Gyatso says, “In the event a person is definitely going to die, and is either in great pain or has virtually become a vegetable, prolonging their life would be cruel.”
The main counter view is that legalising this and murder is a thin line, and it could lead to catastrophic death caused by misusing this leeway. Although this stance is in play, I feel it can be overcome with laws being put in place.
There is also the point where people don't have control over their own body and it is illegal to do certain things with it. This also contradicts your own freedom to do what you like with your own body, as long as it doesn't effect those around you.
Using strict guidelines and procedures I believe that euthanazing should be allowed in the United States. Not only is it a kind way to end suffering, but it is also a right for Americans to choose what happens to their bodies. To require dying patients to endure unrelievable suffering regardless of their wishes is callous and unseemly. Would you require someone to die a slow and painful death against their wishes? I hope not, because through euthanazing you could avoid this and give someone the gift of a death with dignity.
In short - I agree that it should be legalised, but under strict regulations and rules.
What is your viewpoint on North Korea and Russia as threats?
My viewpoint regarding NK and Russia as threats are as follows: The North Koreans pose no threat to the United States as of yet due to the sheer power and stronger military the United States has. Russia on the other hand is a different story. Russia is known as a world power for a reason, their weaponry and military is just as advanced as ours and possess as many warheads as we do. The diplomacy between the US and Russia has always been on shaken grounds, dating back to when Russia overthrew its Czar and set communism as its government. The views between both governments are extremely different which is why the United States and Russia have such heated tensions. While communism and capitalism both work on paper, in real life both forms of government are corrupt in their own regard, however communism is more susceptible to corruption. Greed for power and wealth is human nature, and because of this communism will never work despite how ideal it sounds. Citizens of the United States were taught that communism is an evil form of government, and as such feared communists and paranoia ensued, thus the start of the Cold War. While the Russians are at a shaken peace with the United States, the tensions between both ideals spark every few years always leaving the Red Giant as a threat.
TLDR: Russia is considered a danger because of the threat of Nuclear Warfare should another Cold War type situation arise.
What is your viewpoint on Communism and Capitalism. Which Form Of Government Do You Prefer If They Functioned As Well As They Function On Paper?
Will take some time to post my answer.
- - - Updated - - -
Sorry for the delay.
What is your viewpoint on Communism and Capitalism. Which Form Of Government Do You Prefer If They Functioned As Well As They Function On Paper?
First we will need to analyse about what is communism and what is capitalism. I can then make my judgement.
Capitalism and communism are different in their political and economic ideologies. Capitalism and Communism never go together.
Capitalism is based on private ownership of the means of production and on individual economic freedom. Most of the means of production, such as factories and businesses, are owned by private individuals and not by the government. Private owners make decisions about what and when to produce and how much products should cost. Other characteristics of capitalism include the following: Free competition. The basic rule of capitalism is that people should compete freely without interference from government or any other outside force. Capitalism assumes that the most deserving person will usually win. In theory, prices will be kept as low as possible because consumers will seek the best product for the least amount of money. Supply and demand. In a capitalist system prices are determined by how many products there are and how many people want them. When supplies increase, prices tend to drop. If prices drop, demand usually increases until supplies run out. Then prices will rise once more, but only as long as demand is high. These laws of supply and demand work in a cycle to control prices and keep them from getting too high or too low.
Now more about communism.
Karl Marx, the 19th century father of communism, was outraged by the growing gap between rich and poor. He saw capitalism as an outmoded economic system that exploited workers, which would eventually rise against the rich because the poor were so unfairly treated. Marx thought that the economic system of communism would replace capitalism. Communism is based on principles meant to correct the problems caused by capitalism.
The most important principle of communism is that no private ownership of property should be allowed. Marx believed that private ownership encouraged greed and motivated people to knock out the competition, no matter what the consequences. Property should be shared, and the people should ultimately control the economy. The government should exercise the control in the name of the people, at least in the transition between capitalism and communism. The goals are to eliminate the gap between the rich and poor and bring about economic equality.
Spoiler
Communism in essence, is far superior to Capitalism. It embodies a system of equality, in terms of money and power. In a communistic society, the idea of government has withered away, as there is no need for a ruling body anymore. Yes, I am saying that 'laws' have been abolished since there is no ruling body to implement them, in terms of a written decree that X is illegal and the consequence is Y punishment. The idea of money has been abolished as well, since every worker is equal and receives the same 'payment'; though I will venture to say that there is no real payment, as much as an availability to the same resources and privileges as everyone else. The idea of class, fiscally, has deteriorated as well. Since monetary superiority is not longer possible, no longer can individuals or groups, who previously had more status or money (they go hand in hand), have influence or power, over anyone else. The superiority of this theory over Capitalism is very visible. Capitalism breeds self sustainment, but also advocates a 'dog eat dog' nature, and relies too much on one's ability to do better than another; as this is wrong, because no matter how much Capitalism says, even if you work hard, if you are inherently less adept (Biologically) at a skill, ability to speak, ability to understand quickly, etc, you will not succeed; as society may value a particular 'intelligence' or skill over another. Capitalism advocates the desire for a 'better than normal life', and to have a better education in order to attain this. This breeds materialism, which is an injustice within itself and is the antithesis of what a society should be; and that is the equality of all, in all regards possible.
I hope this answered your question.
What is your viewpoint on legalizing drugs?
Well, I think drugs should not have been legalized. Before then, it was hard enough to keep kids in school from smoking weed and injecting heroin. Now since its been legalized, its like those potheads have a free ticket to doing so.
Whats your view on abortion?
My views on abortion is as follows: Abortion is ok because it is a humane way to end pregnancy. The baby is removed before it can even survive on its on own, and pregnancy is something that isn't always wanted. The mother should be able to decide the fate of her child, and whether she can care for one or not. Also it would be much more painful to give up your child rather than to have it being born at all.
What are your views global warming?
What are your views global warming?
I believe global warming is being overlooked a lot and can cause some serious damage.
To show you what global warming and the effects of it, I have written this;
Global warming is the rise in temperature of the earth's atmosphere.
It's said that by the time a baby born today is 80 years old, the world will be 6 and a half degrees warmer than it is now.
Is this bad? The earth is naturally warmed by rays (or radiation) from the sun which pass through the earth's atmosphere and are reflected back out to space again. The atmosphere's made up of layers of gases, some of which are called 'greenhouse gases'. They're mostly natural and make up a kind of thermal blanket over the earth.This lets some of the rays back out of the atmosphere, keeping the earth at the right temperature for animals, plants and humans to survive (60°F/16°C).So some global warming is good. But if extra greenhouse gases are made, the thermal blanket gets thicker and too much heat is kept in the earth's atmosphere. That's when global warming's bad.
Whilst we are using various green energy sources, we should still push for more.
Renewable energy sources such as geothermal energy are being used much more, yet in various places it could be used more.
I did a report on New Zealand's geothermal energy, I hope you have as much fun reading it as I did making it.
Read the spoiler to find out about geothermal energy.
Spoiler
What are your views on allowing prisoners to vote?
I do think prisoners should be allowed to vote, as long as they are American citizens. Some of them may be innocent, after all.
Are you republican or democratic, and why?
My view on allowing prisoners to vote is as follows: In the US whether you are prisoner or not, you are still a citizen of the United States. As such a citizen has many rights one of them being suffrage or the right to vote. In the United States all men are created equal.But is that really true? A prisoner who may be born and raised in the United States has no rights while in jail. But wait wouldn't that mean that the government is breaking one of the sacred laws that this country was built upon? In a sense yes, but to them no. Imagine not being able to have a say in our country. We are a democracy, which means everyone has the right to vote in our government. Amendment 15 is the voting rights act. In the first section of this amendment, it states the right to vote cannot be taken away from people based on their color, race, or what has happened previously in their life. That amendment is not being applied to the rights of prisoners.
TLDR: Prisoners should be given the right to vote as they are citizens too.
What are your views on religion?
1) Are you republican or democratic, and why?
Let's compare the two.
Origin of the Democratic and Republican parties
The Democratic Party traces its origins to the anti-federalist factions around the time of America’s independence from British rule. These factions were organized into the Democrat – Republican party by Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and other influential opponents of the Federalists in 1792.
The Republican party is the younger of the two parties. Founded in 1854 by anti-slavery expansion activists and modernizers, the Republican Party rose to prominence with the election of Abraham Lincoln, the first Republican president.
History
Since the division of the Republican Party in the election of 1912, the Democratic party has consistently positioned itself to the left of the Republican Party in economic as well as social matters. The economically left-leaning activist philosophy of Franklin D. Roosevelt, which has strongly influenced American liberalism, has shaped much of the party's economic agenda since 1932. Roosevelt's New Deal coalition usually controlled the national government until 1964.
The Republican Party was founded in 1854 by anti-slavery expansion activists and modernizers, it rose to prominence with the election of Abraham Lincoln, the first Republican president. The party presided over the American Civil War and Reconstruction and was harried by internal factions and scandals towards the end of the 19th century. Today, the Republican Party supports a pro-business platform, with further foundations in economic libertarianism and a brand of social conservatism increasingly based on the viewpoints of the Religious Right.
Differences in Philosophy
While there may be several differences in opinion between individual Democrats and Republicans on certain issues, what follows is a generalization of their stand on several of these issues. A Democrat is typically known as a supporter of a broader range of social services in America than those advocated by Republicans. Republican philosophy is based on a limited influence of government and a dominant foreign policy.
Republicans are considered on the "right" end of the political spectrum while Democrats are on the "left." The far right generally is pro-religion, anti-bureaucracy, pro-military, pro-business and pro-personal responsibility.
Republicans, are usually considered conservative (fiscally as well as socially), maybe a little pious, pro-business and against the bureaucracy often associated with big government. They see big governments as wasteful and an obstacle to getting things done. Their approach is Darwinian in that the strong shall survive, cream rises to the top, etc.
To the far left of the spectrum are the extreme liberal, or the most extreme democrats. Democrats are considered more liberal. Democrats tend to favor an active role for government in society and believe that such involvement – be it environmental regulations against polluting or anti-discrimination laws – can improve the quality of people’s lives and help achieve the larger goals of opportunity and equality. On the other hand, Republicans tend to favor a limited role for government in society and believe that such reliance on the private sector (businesses and individuals) – be it avoiding unnecessary environmental regulations or heavy-handed anti-discrimination laws – can improve economic productivity and help achieve the larger goals of freedom and self-reliance
Individual and Community
Republican philosophy leans more towards individual freedoms, rights and responsibilities. In contrast, Democrats attach greater importance to equality and social/community responsibility.
Democratic vs Republican stand on controversial issues
The Democrats and Republicans have varying ideas on many issues, some of which are listed below. These are broadly generalized opinions; it must be noted that there are many politicians in each party who have different and more nuanced positions on these issues.
Military
Republicans: Prefer increasing military spending and have a more hard line stance against countries like Iran, with a higher tendency to deploy the military option.
Democrats: Prefer lower increases in military spending and are comparatively more reluctant to using military force against countries like Iran, Syria and Libya.
Gun control laws
Democrats favor more gun control laws e.g. oppose the right to carry concealed weapons in public places. Republicans oppose gun control laws and are strong supporters of the Second Amendment (the right to bear arms) as well as the right to carry concealed weapons.
Abortion
Democrats support abortion rights and keeping elective abortions legal. Republicans believe abortions should not be legal and that Roe v. Wade should be overturned. Some Republicans go so far as to oppose the contraception mandate i.e. requiring employer-paid health insurance plans to cover contraception.
A related point of divergence is embryonic stem cell research - Democrats support it while Republicans do not.
Gay rights
Democrats tend to favor equal rights for gay and lesbian couples e.g. the right to get married and adopt children. Republicans believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman so they do not support gay marriage or allowing them to adopt children.
Death Penalty
Opponents of the death penalty form a much higher fraction of the Democratic Party when compared to the GOP.
Taxes
Democrats support progressive taxes i.e. they want high-income individuals to pay taxes at a higher rate. They support higher taxes on the wealthy to pay for public programs. Republicans support tax cuts for everyone (rich and poor alike). They consider higher tax rates on the rich a form of class warfare.
Minimum Wage
Democrats favor increase in the minimum wage to help workers. Republicans oppose raising the minimum wage because it hurts businesses.
Role of Government
One of the fundamental differences between Democratic and Republican party ideals is around the role of government. Republicans favor a small government — both in terms of the number of people employed by the government and in terms of the roles and responsibilities of government in society. For example, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is a government agency that many Republican presidential candidates love to deride as an example of "useless" government agencies that they would shut down.
Another example is the food stamps program. Republicans in Congress are demanding cuts in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (or SNAP), while Democrats want to expand this program. Democrats argue that with unemployment rate high in the economy, many families need the assistance provided by the program. Republicans argue that there is a lot of fraud in the program that is wasting taxpayer dollars. They also want to institute clauses that force beneficiaries of the program to take more personal responsibility through measures such as mandatory drug testing, and looking for a job.
Civil Rights
Abraham Lincoln belonged to the Republican Party, so the roots of the party are in individual freedom and the abolition of slavery. Indeed, 82% of the Republicans in the U.S. Senate voted in favor of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 while only 69% of Democrats did. The Southern wing of the Democratic party was vehemently opposed to civil rights legislation.
However, after the passage of the Civil Rights Act, there was a sort of role reversal. Todd Purdum, author of An Idea Whose Time Has Come, a book about the legislative maneuvering behind the passage of the Civil Rights Act, says this in an interview with NPR:
SIEGEL: How much of the Republican Party in Congress supported the civil rights bill as it still was? And how many voted for cloture to break the filibuster?
PURDUM: Well, the final vote in the Senate for the bill was 73 to 27, with 27 out of 33 Republican votes. So in proportional terms, the Republicans supported this bill much more than the Democrats did in both houses.
SIEGEL: A few weeks after Lyndon Johnson signed that bill into law, as we heard at the beginning, the Republicans go and they nominate Barry Goldwater for president, a Republican who had voted against civil rights. And their legacy is jettisoned at that moment.
PURDUM: In some important way that was the beginning of changing the Republican Party from the party of Lincoln into the party of white backlash which is, frankly, reputation that in the South particularly endures to this day, and has hurt the Republican Party as a national brand in presidential elections.
Republicans believe that Purdum's point of view is misleading because Goldwater supported previous attempts at passing a Civil Rights act, and desegregation, but did not like the 1964 Act because he felt it infringed on States' rights.
In any case, the present dynamic is that minorities like African Americans and Hispanics are more likely to vote Democratic than Republican. However, there are prominent African American Republicans like Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice, Herman Cain, Clarence Thomas, Michael Steele and Alan West, as well as Hispanics like Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, Alberto Gonzales and Brian Sandoval.
Read my next post for part 2.
Somone please comment so I can continue.
Have you ever gone to a mental hospital?(51/50)
Yes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnyoungman224
To continue my previous post:
Voter ID laws
Civil liberties groups like the ACLU criticize the GOP for pushing for voter ID laws — Republicans believe these laws are necessary to prevent voter fraud while Democrats claim that voter fraud is virtually non-existent and that these laws disenfranchise black and Hispanic voters who tend to be poorer and unable to obtain ID cards.
Due to the TV coverage during some of the presidential elections in the past, the color Red has become associated with the Republicans (as in Red states – the states where the Republican presidential nominee wins) and Blue is associated with the Democrats.
The Democratic Party, once dominant in the Southeastern United States, is now strongest in the Northeast (Mid-Atlantic and New England), Great Lakes Region, as well as along the Pacific Coast (especially Coastal California), including Hawaii. The Democrats are also strongest in major cities. Recently, Democratic candidates have been faring better in some southern states, such as Virginia, Arkansas, and Florida, and in the Rocky Mountain states, especially Colorado, Montana, Nevada, and New Mexico.
Since 1980, geographically the Republican "base" ("red states") is strongest in the South and West, and weakest in the Northeast and the Pacific Coast. The Republican Party's strongest focus of political influence lies in the Great Plains states, particularly Oklahoma, Kansas, and Nebraska, and in the western states of Idaho, Wyoming, and Utah.
Famous Republican vs Democratic Presidents
Republicans have controlled the White House for 28 of the last 43 years since Richard Nixon became president. Famous Democrat Presidents have been Franklin Roosevelt, who pioneered the New Deal in America and stood for 4 terms, John F. Kennedy, who presided over the Bay of Pigs invasion and the Cuban missile crisis, and was assassinated in Office; Bill Clinton, who was impeached by the House of Representatives; and Nobel Peace Prize winners Barack Obama and Jimmy Carter.
Famous Republican Presidents include Abraham Lincoln, who abolished slavery; Teddy Roosevelt, known for the Panama Canal; Ronald Reagan, credited for ending the Cold War with Gorbachev; and the two Bush family Presidents of recent times. Republican President Richard Nixon was forced to resign over the Watergate scandal.
Spoiler
2) What are your views on religion?
I am an atheist, and I find it absurd how people can be so dedicated to it.
Atheism is the absence of belief in any Gods or spiritual beings. The word Atheism comes from a, meaning without, and theism meaning belief in god or gods.
Sorry for the long post,
Here is my question for the next person;
What's your opinion about human cloning?
Bump
Fist bump
Human cloning?
Apparently cloning isn't all in what you think it's all about, there's a lot more to it.
Health:
Cloning can be used in health. Say, someone is in an urgent need of stem cells, that person will have to go through a transplant in their bone marrow. Unfortunately though, stem cells are seen as foreign within the body it travels from person to person, so cloning has been set into place so that you may grow stem cells identical to your current, and you can get those transplanted.
Process:
To be able to create a human clone, there's a process. A woman will have to donate one of her eggs, and the nucleus of that egg will have to be taken out. The person that you want to have cloned will have donate one of their cells. The egg and the cell are then fused together, and given to a substitute mother. This mother will then give birth to that clone.
Cons:
There has been a few tests with human cloning. The chances of a successful cloning is quite low. There are many things wrong when one attempts to clone:
-Deformities
-Deaths at birth
-Possible shorter life-span for clone
-Identity Crises
-Social Acceptance
Pros:
-More stem cells/organs available
-Gay couples could use this method to take their chromosomes and put them in an egg to have a child resembling them.
-A twining relationship with your clone (like how people believe twins are so close)
-Freedom
-To cure infertility
What are my views?
I, personally am for.
Why? Because now that I've gone into research on this topic I feel this could be a way to solve multiple problems within society and dealing with healthcare. Though, I'd hope that scientists go further into research to higher the success rates on births. I feel the more research, the more we can avoid such problems.
What are your thoughts on homophobia?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tricky
Although I do have these views, I do support the rights of the homosexuals, and I am not a homophobic person.Quote:
Originally Posted by crd
I feel like homophobia is a specific mind set, which some people just can't get over the fact that it is possible.
People such as Christians (or they should, if they follow everything the bible says), are supposed to hate homosexuals.
I personally find this wrong, and think we shouldn't do such a thing.
It all comes down to how I follow the guidelines of the UDHR.
What do you think should be done about over population?
I really have no bias view on over-population. I don't see a humane solution to it. The people saying to kill off prisoners all across the world are just downright crazy, for some of those prisoners may be innocent. Obviously over-population is a problem, but what can we do? I forward this question to the next person.Quote:
Originally Posted by crd
Jesus major TL;DR 0-0Quote:
Originally Posted by crd
Answer to shadow's question:
We can issue birth control in many other areas besides China if it already hasn't been done(idk im not a politics person)
Question: Are you pro-abortion or pro-life? (No abortions)