Agreed, also the feedback system is quite useless how it is now, only use it to unstick, but the future improvements section in the forums is a lot better and a good replacement, and we read them.
Printable View
I agree, however, the forums do not give the chance for updates to get feedback before the update has been released. This can lead to discontent from the players. Updates such as the profile update could have been improved if the developers had released the plans to change it. People could give their valuable feedback, so that everyone is genuinely happy with the updates and not shocked about the changes. This applies only to updates that affect the entire community such as gun nerfs, gun bans, new "mini-projects" eg Plasma Corp. Basically ideas/coming soon updates. Excluding regular updates.
Maybe you don't know but after the management purged a number of their staff and there's mass resignation the player count has never been high. Some attributed it to the nerfing of guns and so they quit.
Your ideas may work, but the looking at the current state of affairs in game, there's much more that needs to be done. Especially its unaccounted for permabans of players....and its management.
I understand that there was a decline in the general number of the staff, especially the developers. My thread is only about discussing the ideas. If there is nothing done to get back a healthy amount of staff, you can't have a healthy amount of players. It's the first step in the right direction. But I virtually have no power to change it.
I agree that the forums should be used to gather pre-release feedback on SOME things. Plasma Corp was given a quick rundown on here first, and then there were updates as it was worked on before release. However, I don’t think that gun balances and stuff like that should be discussed here, since the majority would be “Don’t change anything I like using my super powerful guns to mow down people!”