Your suggestion as a whole isn't good. But I LIKED, I mean, I LOVED item FOUR, that's why I mentioned it.
Printable View
Pertaining to the issue of false reviews, as I have said, the items involved will be shown so the credibility of the review will be judged by the player when they look at the items involved.
If i did a fair trade of say, 1 shovel for 2 shells (which is the market rate) and someone leaves a bad review, then those who view my review will tell that the reviewer is trolling or overly pessimistic.
Players can choose to use fake accounts to trade, but their fake accounts will have to buy a trade permit as well as pay for every single trade that they undertake (which is going to be costly for anyone to want to rationally do it.) Imagine someone buying a trade plus and undertaking 20 trades with his main account - thats a total of nearly 1k gralats wasted, as well as time. Plus, if a guy decided to trade with them and they see their past 10 trades was done with the same guy using similar items repetitively, obviously they would know the review is faked.
Sent from my SM-J600G using Tapatalk
A shoot here we go again, another trash idea
Are you plagiarising from SGSecure? Do you want the whole SCDF to come repelling down the Chinook to subdue all passerby?
Been so long since I've used the forum and this is what I came back to, lol. Classic LYK.
#4 is a good idea. I’d love to see my trade logs and things like that.
Item 4 is the only item I'd be on board with.
The rest aren't that good and the only reason why is because admins specifically state your items are your responsibility, and they can't do anything about scammers or when your items get scammed.
AZN (Sent from my iPhone)
No you're missing the point here....
We fall victim to scams because we do not know the background of the other party well.
Having #1 allows us to know the trade history of the other party so we can decide if we are to go ahead with transaction. Being responsible is one thing, but we could only be responsible for our items if we know the tradjng habits of the other party through their trade reviews as I have suggested. Without that, even if you are superresponsible and you end up trading with a serial scammer theres no way for you to know.
Sent from my SM-J600G using Tapatalk
See that would work if there weren't such things as boosting reputation stats and whatnot the scammers could use to make themselves seem legit. People aren't dumb, and many users have been using other tactics (such has having many friends say their casino is legit or having their friend severely overpay for a cheap item and declining their offer, making the item seem super rare) to scam other players. As the system grows, so does the intelligence of the people playing, and the system would soon just end up becoming another thing where traders bribe other users to +rep them for items or convince their friends to.
Maybe I'm missing something but I still think this idea isn't all that good.
AZN (Sent from my iPhone)
Boosting reputation is one common issue but, if you were really scammed by a guy, would you , on his request, still give him a good reputation? And even if he or she was your friend, would you still befriend that person?
If the trade was fair and the person wanted to boost a little reputation, it won't matter because the reviews they get would alrwady be quite good in the first place since they traded fairly.
Trade permits is to ensure that traders take trading seriously and do not troll or hog trade tables without trading etc.
Sent from my SM-J600G using Tapatalk