In this whole matter, both the admin and the players have their own part to reflect on. I wouldn't say that reither side is correct or more reasonable than the other.
I wrote two articles to explain my stand. And just in case yo've not seen it, they are here.
https://lykspersonalblog.files.wordp...ysis-final.pdf
https://lykspersonalblog.files.wordp...rf-of-buff.pdf
I'd say that Bitzsam changed the stats in the name of his job with complete disregard for the weapon's stakholders -the players.
I wouldn't want to be disregarded like that, nor as a player will I accept being treated like that. If everything is done autonomously, the era community will not be functioning like a community, but more like an oligarch or a communist state whereby decisions are made by one man.
but, the intention behind the change - to make the game more fair is actually what I support.
In this egoistic environment of the game, we players have inadvertently and probably subconsiously adopted a mindset of "things that will affect me should be eliminated entirely"
and this is why many players are reluctant to accept this change.
In our egoistic pursuit for base hours, killing supremacy and spar domination, we have forgotten about the things that really mattered. Such as the survival of other, new players, gangs etc. All these issues are derived from this egoistic culture and it has thus introduced severe inequlity in the game - making it very difficult to maintain a fair, competency based gameplay , rather than a cash-based one.
Bitzsam intention wasn't wrong. It is in fact correct and sound. We need to actually stop trying to stay in the egoistic self and actually look at the bigger picture, for the sustainability of fair play and the players themselves.
Recognise that most of the comaplaints are saying things like "I worked so hard for it..." , "I spent my own real money", etc.
I.... I .... I
its a display of self-entitlement.
And all these are paradoxical.
we players report when some players hack or abuse glitches to their advanatge. We condemn them and we probably hated them. This is because they have achieved an unfair edge over all of us. Yet, now all of us are fighting for that unfair firearm advantage so that we could exploit it to our advantage, and some of the players are probably attempting to deter this shift toward a more fair gameply environment.
Ironic isn't it?