View Poll Results: Would you like more gang member slots?

Voters
49. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    35 71.43%
  • No

    14 28.57%
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 44

Thread: Bigger Gangs

  1. #21
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Idiotism
    Posts
    1,565
    I mean, I'm all for bigger gangs and stuff, but I know people will abuse it and won't change how they work.

  2. #22
    Big Cheese Lord Greg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    England
    Posts
    2,600
    50-100 people sounds far too high. Could you imagine 100 people fighting in 1 base with just 2 gangs? Would be too much lag, spam, flag rushing and the base would be packed. Maybe 30 people per gang or an extra ally spot would be better.

  3. #23
    Street Boss Alan Harper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    838
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Greg View Post
    50-100 people sounds far too high. Could you imagine 100 people fighting in 1 base with just 2 gangs? Would be too much lag, spam, flag rushing and the base would be packed. Maybe 30 people per gang or an extra ally spot would be better.
    You read my mind O.o

  4. #24
    Big Cheese
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Puerto Rico, United States
    Posts
    1,052
    More PBP's in one base. No, i don't agree.

  5. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by Duke View Post
    That is exactly my idea, allies should not be used for subtags, but rather different gangs who wants treaties/alliances.
    yes yes yes


    But not 100 like you suggested, highest I would even bother with is 50.
    hi

  6. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by Duke View Post
    You expect 100 people to all be online at the sametime? Even if so your members should be mature enough to not spam, and if they can't then kick them, simple as that.
    I meant as in gun spam.. It would be way too laggy. Like I said, If we were going to add more member spots only add like five more spots.
    That's Unfortunate

  7. #27
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    312
    50 members seems reasonable though. If you really want to stop temp recruiting then only allow a certain ammount of players to be recruited per day.

  8. #28
    Veteran Slasher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Ventura
    Posts
    137
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Greg View Post
    50-100 people sounds far too high. Could you imagine 100 people fighting in 1 base with just 2 gangs? Would be too much lag, spam, flag rushing and the base would be packed. Maybe 30 people per gang or an extra ally spot would be better.
    If you were a baser and a leader and had 50 online people you wouldn't keep them in 1 base you go for taking more you can take several bases with that many people.

  9. #29
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    312
    Also to all of you whining about 50-100 people in 1 base that has already happened tons of times. The moat recent just yesterday Obsidian and EBIZOU had over 20 members each in gz, plus random gangs.

  10. #30
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    bbz, tachi, and gz
    Posts
    568
    No 25 people is plenty. Now if more era tripled the amount of bases to 24 then gangs with 50 max is good

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •