Quote Originally Posted by BiTzSam View Post
Arguments? The only argument- non plural is that you spent money on the guns. So what? I've already explained why that is not a reasoning against the guns being brought down to give lower tier- skilled gun users an advantage. The guns were too strong in comparison with the majority of the other guns in the game, if you say otherwise then you are simply biased because you bought them.
I'm in this position because I am unbiased. You can say 'there needs to be more people making the decisions' but guess what those people would also have to be unbiased and therefore the same conclusion will be reached.

I paid for most of the high tier guns such as bar, shipka, pbp myself. I didn't get those guns for free and yet I am willing to put aside the fact that I paid for them, be unbiased and balance them for the benefit of gameplay as a whole
You claim to be unbiased but your response to people spending money on weapons and the fact they are devalued is so what. That speaks for itself your biased and discriminate towards people who grind for shells or spend real life currency. The fact you don't value spending money doesn't take into consideration the people that do. The hypocrisy is incredible in your statement.

You fail to realize that your opinion alone is not the only one that needs to be taken into consideration. Just because you say something is too powerful or too weak doesn't make it so.

700 replies but apparently nothing is wrong.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk