The one about the Ghost M4

[Iceman]

Agreed, Stop making "High priced guns" will solve this problem, You put a 187k+ gun out there and then nerf it to where those with 50k guns can compete with it... This is the good ole bait and switch.... But in the end people will either stop buying the high priced guns on release or you will continue to be make a killing off this scam...

Ppl will continue to get scammed....then they accuse others of fraud smh.
They put all of these restrictions and swear filters for 12 year olds yet are perfectly fine cornering 12 year old and younger children and extorting their parents for money. So I doubt they will stop the cash cow.

[W R A T H]

Ppl will continue to get scammed....then they accuse others of fraud smh.

This is why i have attempted to make my case about how using in game money and guns should be allowed to be traded... Its the entire economy on PC era... So when i buy a gun and it gets nerfed into the ground i have the option to try and trade it to recoop some of my losses.. but it will never happen on here.

[Rozen S]

Something feels odd about the firemode, shouldn't I be able to put out a higher firerate if I tap it? Why is auto faster?

[Collin.]

I can't even believe that the gm4 was nerfed. Take this from someone who doesn't own it either.
The difference in price between the BAR and gm4 is marginal, 13k.
With that said, the gm4 should only be slightly worse than its 200k counterpart. The gm4 shouldnt recieve the nerf it already has (lower fire rate and smaller magazine, and longer reload?). That's too much. A 13k difference doesn't call for such a significant nerf. Both weapons are used in different situations, and some people just simply prefer one over the other. The bar provides great damage with decent maneuverability, while the gm4 is a more maneuverable weapon at the cost of damage. Its also super unfair to compare the gm4 to the pdw (someone said that earlier). The weapons should not be compared; they are on completely different planes based on price and performance.

The changes need to be reverted. Keep in mind this opinion is not biased; I do not own a gm4. It's nice to have a wide range of guns that are on the same level with each other. It adds a nice variety to gameplay. If this nerf remains, era is once again going to be dominated by bars.

[W R A T H]

Haha, Why would they? Why you are at it nerf all guns over the 100K threshhold so all guns are on the same playing field as the 50k guns... We already paid for them... you dont do refunds... finish the scam off

[Rozen S]

I can't even believe that the gm4 was nerfed. Take this from someone who doesn't own it either.
The difference in price between the BAR and gm4 is marginal, 13k.
With that said, the gm4 should only be slightly worse than its 200k counterpart. The gm4 shouldnt recieve the nerf it already has (lower fire rate and smaller magazine, and longer reload?). That's too much. A 13k difference doesn't call for such a significant nerf. Both weapons are used in different situations, and some people just simply prefer one over the other. The bar provides great damage with decent maneuverability, while the gm4 is a more maneuverable weapon at the cost of damage. Its also super unfair to compare the gm4 to the pdw (someone said that earlier). The weapons should not be compared; they are on completely different planes based on price and performance.

The changes need to be reverted. Keep in mind this opinion is not biased; I do not own a gm4. It's nice to have a wide range of guns that are on the same level with each other. It adds a nice variety to gameplay. If this nerf remains, era is once again going to be dominated by bars.

This ^

[Cero]

I can't even believe that the gm4 was nerfed. Take this from someone who doesn't own it either.
The difference in price between the BAR and gm4 is marginal, 13k.
With that said, the gm4 should only be slightly worse than its 200k counterpart. The gm4 shouldnt recieve the nerf it already has (lower fire rate and smaller magazine, and longer reload?). That's too much. A 13k difference doesn't call for such a significant nerf. Both weapons are used in different situations, and some people just simply prefer one over the other. The bar provides great damage with decent maneuverability, while the gm4 is a more maneuverable weapon at the cost of damage. Its also super unfair to compare the gm4 to the pdw (someone said that earlier). The weapons should not be compared; they are on completely different planes based on price and performance.

The changes need to be reverted. Keep in mind this opinion is not biased; I do not own a gm4. It's nice to have a wide range of guns that are on the same level with each other. It adds a nice variety to gameplay. If this nerf remains, era is once again going to be dominated by bars.

What about all the other high priced guns that were nerfed? I only see you speaking for 2...

[Cokeplus]

I better still b able to fight p2ks with this .

[manbearpig]

Also, manbearpig, this quote "If you put a player with M4a3 vs Gm4,the Gm4 will get rekt..."
that's worst theory ever

First dont comment on things you dont know.
Second,do you even own gm4?
And last if you do own gm4,i wanna see you try and spar vs Retro with his m4a3;he will spam that thing like theres no tomorrow.

- - - Updated - - -

Its the skills of a player, not a gun
like if a skilled M4 user vs another skilled M4 user
one will win depending on a sparring technique of the individual
it may be 'evenly matched' or 'one is better than the other'

Wow really,you dont say sherlock?
Isnt that obvious
We are not talking here about skills or m4 in particular,so yeah...anymore replies you might have "Talk to the hand"

[Star*]

I don't understand what both of you are saying.

This thread is about GM4 relations and not regarding other guns in any particular.