Page 18 of 114 FirstFirst ... 8 16 17 18 19 20 28 68 ... LastLast
Results 171 to 180 of 1137

Thread: READ- Weapon Rebalancing

  1. #171
    Overlord Sottocapo N!chola$'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    4,784
    Quote Originally Posted by BlinkEra View Post
    Uhm..looking up to Veteran players?

    That's funny, a lot of them are passive-aggressive and rude.
    It really depends who you're talking to.

    You should be glad more noobie players will come in, maybe they'll actually have a chance.
    Doubt it, oh yes and there is something in Apples rules and regulations about merchandise in-game, I'll copy it down and paste it when I scroll all the way back up to the page...rip ipad rn
    Ask me anything and ill try my best to answer

  2. #172
    Quote Originally Posted by Psycho Adelphos View Post
    Firstly, before you say Im just trying to act like an admin let me help you erase those illusions youve created. You fail to realize that I myself am a veteran player, I can guarantee you Ive been in this community longer than you have, as Ive played iosEra since its initial release. I own most of the guns that Bitz is proposing to be balanced. So if anything your point holds no merit being that I would still play regardless of the changes. These changes are made with good reason and in fact if you see the rising playerbase then you would be aware of the fact that many many people are getting access to these strong weapons because this game is almost solely pay to win.

    That being said, if the guns were not changed you'd see the continued issues we have in basing, forting, and just pking or sparring in general. Because these guns are so strong there is almost little to no incentive to actually try when you can just sit and spam the gun all day and be rewarded for it. Dont believe me? Look at all of the sparrers that benefitted from the chemical gun, or the people that benefit from spamming bars and flamethrowers during forts.

    The point I am trying to state here is that this update is for the betterment of the community, and rather than you sit there and complain maybe you can put some useful input in the discussion rather than try to knock me down.
    Daaang i hate seing this kind of post in era forum too formal too much trying to be perfect grammar and not on the point huh i dont bother to read the whole content of your post

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Psycho Adelphos View Post
    Firstly, before you say Im just trying to act like an admin let me help you erase those illusions youve created. You fail to realize that I myself am a veteran player, I can guarantee you Ive been in this community longer than you have, as Ive played iosEra since its initial release. I own most of the guns that Bitz is proposing to be balanced. So if anything your point holds no merit being that I would still play regardless of the changes. These changes are made with good reason and in fact if you see the rising playerbase then you would be aware of the fact that many many people are getting access to these strong weapons because this game is almost solely pay to win.

    That being said, if the guns were not changed you'd see the continued issues we have in basing, forting, and just pking or sparring in general. Because these guns are so strong there is almost little to no incentive to actually try when you can just sit and spam the gun all day and be rewarded for it. Dont believe me? Look at all of the sparrers that benefitted from the chemical gun, or the people that benefit from spamming bars and flamethrowers during forts.

    The point I am trying to state here is that this update is for the betterment of the community, and rather than you sit there and complain maybe you can put some useful input in the discussion rather than try to knock me down.
    Daaan i hate seing this kind of post in era forum too formal too much trying to be perfect grammar and not on the point huh i dont bother to read the whole content of your post

    - - - Updated - - -

    Well another reason for a player to quit is after working so hard for the expensive gun and to know its a sux gun, if you want more players to stay buff the jobs.

  3. #173
    Gun Admin BiTzSam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,940
    After doing some testing i've changed the GM4 again, new stats are

    Name - Ghost M4
    Freeze - 0.145 0.14
    Firerate - 0.28 0.3
    Spread - 0.065
    Clip - 21
    Reload - 0.6 0.55
    Bullets - 1
    Auto - N Yes
    Stacked - N

    Even did a few test spars with it-

    out of 8 spars against 4 different people which included 6 GM4s, 1 Bar and 1 ion carbine I won 7 out of the 8 using the rebalanced GM4 stats posted above whilst all of their guns were the unchanged.
    Almost won against the ion carbine guy except there was a delay in him taking damage.

    Tested the rebalanced bar and i'm happy with those stats. It feel much more fair but is still strong for its price. Went on a 10 killstreak as a solo base attacker against Darkside in BBZ who were mostly using BARs. Ironically one darkside member who kept talking about how bad I am for wanting to nerf the bar died to me 2s in a row whilst he was using the unnerfed version of the BAR against me
    Last edited by BiTzSam; 05-08-2017 at 09:28 AM.

  4. #174
    This will be great for me as I have 31 guns on Graal and I support this. As I think about it, as long as everyone's gun is nerfed, it'll be great for me to start actually using more guns in my inventory. But here's the thing, as long as these nerfed guns don't become worse than say 100k magnum pistol, I'll be fine. To all those saying all giving consent to this are admin position seekers, thats completely immature. I can't wait to stop using the same old guns on spar just because my lower tier guns would stand no chance against the higher tier guns (more strongly In spar). I would be fine with this, but these nerfs can't exceeed to the extent that a cheaper gun has the same or better stats. For example, flame and electric staff. Had flame not had the flame effect, what would be the point of the extra 20 ec? (Ignoring "rarity" factor) And that would make me fight hard for money that was burned off from me. Other then that, I say brilliant idea BitzSam, Thank you!

  5. #175
    Gun Admin BiTzSam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,940
    Tested out the p2k, also happy with the changed I made. For someone that according to some of you 'doesn't pk/ base or know how to play the game' i'm certainly holding my own as a solo player against a gang of people using the unnerfed/ 'stronger' guns. So if even I can still do well, then you guys who must have significantly more skill than me should be more than fine right?

  6. #176
    Street Boss XR's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    945
    Quote Originally Posted by BiTzSam View Post
    After doing some testing i've changed the GM4 again, new stats are

    Name - Ghost M4
    Freeze - 0.145 0.14
    Firerate - 0.28 0.3
    Spread - 0.065
    Clip - 21
    Reload - 0.6 0.55
    Bullets - 1
    Auto - N Yes
    Stacked - N

    Even did a few test spars with it-

    out of 8 spars against 4 different people which included 6 GM4s, 1 Bar and 1 ion carbine I won 7 out of the 8 using the rebalanced GM4 stats posted above whilst all of their guns were the unchanged.
    Almost won against the ion carbine guy except there was a delay in him taking damage.

    Tested the rebalanced bar and i'm happy with those stats. It feel much more fair but is still strong for its price. Went on a 10 killstreak as a solo base attacker against Darkside in BBZ who were mostly using BARs. Ironically one darkside member who kept talking about how bad I am for wanting to nerf the bar died to me 2s in a row whilst he was using the unnerfed version of the BAR against me
    Considering I don't even use gm4 I'd be fine with those changes. They seem ok.

  7. #177
    Not Actually Banned Yet Bulletzone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,849
    Nerf AK47.

    Jk.
    "A fool thinks they know everything but a wise person knows there's something to learn from everyone"
    -
    "Great leaders don't complain about the tools they are given. They work to sharpen them"

  8. #178
    Gun Admin BiTzSam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,940
    Quote Originally Posted by Xur View Post
    Considering I don't even use gm4 I'd be fine with those changes. They seem ok.
    Are you still fine with those changes when you realise that the ion carbine will face similar changes due to it being the slightly better ec alternative to the gm4

  9. #179
    Street Boss XR's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    945
    Quote Originally Posted by BiTzSam View Post
    Are you still fine with those changes when you realise that the ion carbine will face similar changes due to it being the slightly better ec alternative to the gm4
    I mean carbine is pretty much an automatic gm4, only thing I'm concerned with now is how the longer reloads will effect gameplay. Will bar/vector/carbine stay automatic? Or will just carbine go semi

  10. #180
    (Irrelevant) iMagicBae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    New York, Bronx
    Posts
    1,681
    Quote Originally Posted by BiTzSam View Post
    Are you still fine with those changes when you realise that the ion carbine will face similar changes due to it being the slightly better ec alternative to the gm4
    Give us a knife in exchange for the loss of auto and semi switch.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    Every Pro Was Once A Noob.
    Every Expert Was Once An Amateur...
    Growing Bigger Is Just A Matter Of Time
    ATT-


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •