READ- Weapon Rebalancing

[jaxwashere]

Arguments? The only argument- non plural is that you spent money on the guns. So what? I've already explained why that is not a reasoning against the guns being brought down to give lower tier- skilled gun users an advantage. The guns were too strong in comparison with the majority of the other guns in the game, if you say otherwise then you are simply biased because you bought them.
I'm in this position because I am unbiased. You can say 'there needs to be more people making the decisions' but guess what those people would also have to be unbiased and therefore the same conclusion will be reached.

I paid for most of the high tier guns such as bar, shipka, pbp myself. I didn't get those guns for free and yet I am willing to put aside the fact that I paid for them, be unbiased and balance them for the benefit of gameplay as a whole

You claim to be unbiased but your response to people spending money on weapons and the fact they are devalued is so what. That speaks for itself your biased and discriminate towards people who grind for shells or spend real life currency. The fact you don't value spending money doesn't take into consideration the people that do. The hypocrisy is incredible in your statement.

You fail to realize that your opinion alone is not the only one that needs to be taken into consideration. Just because you say something is too powerful or too weak doesn't make it so.

700 replies but apparently nothing is wrong.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[N!chola$]

It got that change based on a suggestion from this thread. Nobody said anything when it was discussed against it so I implemented it

You never said you were considering the idea hence the reason why 'Nobody said anything'. The NEXT time you are considering and idea make it clear you want feedback on it because we can never tell if your serious or not. (Honestly I thought the nerf was a joke and then you said it was staying that way)

[Abdullah1441]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't we say no when BiTzSam trying nerfing the BAR? Something about removing Perfect Shape...

[N!chola$]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't we say no when BiTzSam trying nerfing the BAR? Something about removing Perfect Shape...

I would prefer that idea other this any day.

[GenoIndeed]

At this point, it should be clear that the logic behind all this isn't correct, so why is this still an argument and not reset and reworked yet?

[Joeyaudi1]

At this point, it should be clear that the logic behind all this isn't correct, so why is this still an argument and not reset and reworked yet?

The only ones talking are the ones complaining, the others are enjoying their gameplay

[GenoIndeed]

We'll continue to "complain" since this all still wasn't fair or properly done.

[MrOmz]

That cc nerf was mean. I suggest to make it AT LEAST 20-25%

[XR]

Arguments? The only argument- non plural is that you spent money on the guns. So what? I've already explained why that is not a reasoning against the guns being brought down to give lower tier- skilled gun users an advantage. The guns were too strong in comparison with the majority of the other guns in the game, if you say otherwise then you are simply biased because you bought them.
I'm in this position because I am unbiased. You can say 'there needs to be more people making the decisions' but guess what those people would also have to be unbiased and therefore the same conclusion will be reached.

I paid for most of the high tier guns such as bar, shipka, pbp myself. I didn't get those guns for free and yet I am willing to put aside the fact that I paid for them, be unbiased and balance them for the benefit of gameplay as a whole

- - - Updated - - -



I've explained multiple times why you can't nerf the 2 strongest guns and then leave the other guns. Doesn't take much common sense to see that if the 2 best guns are brought down, so do similar guns so that those guns don't just replace them as they'd become statistically better.

I've only ignored your suggestions if they were the same repetitive argument i've answered 100 times or if they were for biased reasonings such as you suggesting me ingame to buff the p2ks (and after looking at your account I happened to see that you had just reached 100k kills so suprise suprise why you would want those buffed now that you can buy them).

The only valid suggestion i've seen you make is the cripple cannon which I have already implemented by reducing its knockback potential from 50% to 10%

I'm not trying to be biased, I never really used bar I just knew that the 10 damage was a pain to fight against in spar as it's 5 shot vs 6 shot.

And I think you have the wrong person, cause I have 249k kills and have had P2ks for like 2 years.

[Czar Misago]

It got that change based on a suggestion from this thread. Nobody said anything when it was discussed against it so I implemented it

- - - Updated - - -



What's ironic is you calling his stats ironic as an attempt to prove the point that his stats mean he can't have an opinion when you have 1/5th of his kills.

30000 kills is enough kills to have an opinion. Even at 10000 I would say that is enough. Eras gameplay is not a complex system, you don't need 200k-500k kills to have the most 'valid' opinion as your experiences are no difference to theirs. All it comes down to is how much you play/ how powerful your guns are.
Kills don't mean anything in this game anymore with the amount of account sharing that goes on, with multiple people getting kill counts up on a singular account.

Saying that he isn't allowed to have an opinion and trying to ridicule him because he has a different and arguable more logically reasoned than those counter arguments is just another tactic to try devalue what he had to say because you have no actual response. It's pretty childish behaviour, not that, that is unexpected but you can't try and argue a point that these changes are unreasonable when so are the points and attitudes most of you have had

Keep the 15 clip lmao pls I love the reload and the ROF isnt even bad LMAO if you tap you can shoot it fast