Page 12 of 13 FirstFirst ... 2 10 11 12 13 LastLast
Results 111 to 120 of 125

Thread: layerd owns sk??!!!

  1. #111
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    10,403
    Quote Originally Posted by crd View Post
    So who does the gang go to?
    Obviously no one but the staffs.

  2. #112
    Ex. Player Relations Admi RenoDorvay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Melboune, Australia
    Posts
    866
    As far as I'm concerned the gang should logically just be handed to the most loyal/active sK member who's high up in the chain. I can't even see why there's been debate over it. It should not go to Hearts.

    It's just a gang, regardless of its history.
    Legal threats should go through the support center.


    Ex. iEra Player Relations Admin - Oceania/Asia. 2011-2017.
    "If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and man.” — Mark Twain

  3. #113
    Street Boss crd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    712
    Quote Originally Posted by RenoDorvay View Post
    As far as I'm concerned the gang should logically just be handed to the most loyal/active sK member who's high up in the chain. I can't even see why there's been debate over it. It should not go to Hearts.

    It's just a gang, regardless of its history.
    Why should it go to someone who's loyal and active in sK? Shouldn't it be up for anyone?

    crd 2010-2015
    Also message me if you have any questions or concerns here.
    Or contact me by email at [email protected]
    Play Zone? Visit me over at their forums!
    Click a sitting Orc for my graphics thread

  4. #114
    Street Boss olive6661's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    772
    How about we settle this....give the gang to MEEEEEEEE
    Feel free to PM "Scopez" in game. I swear I don't bite.

  5. #115
    Ex. Player Relations Admi RenoDorvay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Melboune, Australia
    Posts
    866
    Quote Originally Posted by crd View Post
    Why should it go to someone who's loyal and active in sK? Shouldn't it be up for anyone?
    The fact of the matter is that a staff member removed it from someone for what I assume is a good reason. The question now is 'who should it go to?'. In my mind it would be unfair to the rest of the gang to just have a lotto, or make players draw straws, to decide who gets ownership. It should stay with the sK faithful.

    I haven't really been following this anymore than the start with pandavi etc, I assume that there's more to it than that because I can't see a reason for us to get involved if there's been a legal/above-board exchange of ownership. If the gang was exchanged freely and within the rules it should remain with pandavi. Again though, I doubt it was legal because if it was we wouldn't have taken the gang.
    Legal threats should go through the support center.


    Ex. iEra Player Relations Admin - Oceania/Asia. 2011-2017.
    "If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and man.” — Mark Twain

  6. #116
    Street Boss crd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    712
    Quote Originally Posted by RenoDorvay View Post
    The fact of the matter is that a staff member removed it from someone for what I assume is a good reason. The question now is 'who should it go to?'. In my mind it would be unfair to the rest of the gang to just have a lotto, or make players draw straws, to decide who gets ownership. It should stay with the sK faithful.

    I haven't really been following this anymore than the start with pandavi etc, I assume that there's more to it than that because I can't see a reason for us to get involved if there's been a legal/above-board exchange of ownership. If the gang was exchanged freely and within the rules it should remain with pandavi. Again though, I doubt it was legal because if it was we wouldn't have taken the gang.
    How is it fair if it just goes straight back to sK, when we don't know what they will do with it, possibly give it to someone again?
    I say it should be given to the most worthy.
    Or be casted to a vote.

    crd 2010-2015
    Also message me if you have any questions or concerns here.
    Or contact me by email at [email protected]
    Play Zone? Visit me over at their forums!
    Click a sitting Orc for my graphics thread

  7. #117
    Ex. Player Relations Admi RenoDorvay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Melboune, Australia
    Posts
    866
    Quote Originally Posted by crd View Post
    How is it fair if it just goes straight back to sK, when we don't know what they will do with it, possibly give it to someone again?
    I say it should be given to the most worthy.
    Or be casted to a vote.
    If we're assuming the gang was illegally sold, the gang should of course be returned the members. Why punish the gang for someone's failing to stay within the rules of the game?
    If the gang wasn't illegally sold, it was perfectly within the rights of the ex-owner to give the gang away and we'll give the gang back to the new owner I'm sure.
    Legal threats should go through the support center.


    Ex. iEra Player Relations Admin - Oceania/Asia. 2011-2017.
    "If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and man.” — Mark Twain

  8. #118
    Street Boss crd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    712
    Quote Originally Posted by RenoDorvay View Post
    If we're assuming the gang was illegally sold, the gang should of course be returned the members. Why punish the gang for someone's failing to stay within the rules of the game?
    If the gang wasn't illegally sold, it was perfectly within the rights of the ex-owner to give the gang away and we'll give the gang back to the new owner I'm sure.
    From my knowledge, I saw that iPandavi had the gang after it was taken away, and then gave it up again. (Not sure if taken away?)
    What now?

    crd 2010-2015
    Also message me if you have any questions or concerns here.
    Or contact me by email at [email protected]
    Play Zone? Visit me over at their forums!
    Click a sitting Orc for my graphics thread

  9. #119
    Ex. Player Relations Admi RenoDorvay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Melboune, Australia
    Posts
    866
    Quote Originally Posted by crd View Post
    From my knowledge, I saw that iPandavi had the gang after it was taken away, and then gave it up again. (Not sure if taken away?)
    What now?
    If ipandavi obtained the gang legally, whoever he gave it to is the rightful owner of sK.
    Legal threats should go through the support center.


    Ex. iEra Player Relations Admin - Oceania/Asia. 2011-2017.
    "If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and man.” — Mark Twain

  10. #120
    Street Boss crd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    712
    Quote Originally Posted by RenoDorvay View Post
    If ipandavi obtained the gang legally, whoever he gave it to is the rightful owner of sK.
    He gave it up. I think Layerd reclaimed it until the issue got sorted.
    Forgive me if I'm wrong, I'm just going with what I've heard.

    crd 2010-2015
    Also message me if you have any questions or concerns here.
    Or contact me by email at [email protected]
    Play Zone? Visit me over at their forums!
    Click a sitting Orc for my graphics thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •