
Originally Posted by
Donald
One I gotta saw is, I'm fine with the changes that will be made if its about giving noobs a chance of winning. But what I'm not fond with is this discussion about gun hierarchies because it seems like an entirely subjective things that is relative to nerfing guns meaning to say I'm ok for example my ion being nerfed but not to the point where a weapon which wasn''t as good as it before is now proportionally better just because it was obtained by a method you judged to be harder to get is rarer or is 'free'. So I'm hoping you keep things as proportionate as possible & not lean so much say Events guns should be nerfed more but auction guns not so much, just keep it fair, if you're going to nert it, then nerf it all equally I don't think reward guns, auction guns or event guns should deserve any subjective favouritism because of how they were obtained, because by that time its no longer about making things fair for noobs its bias.
Just to clarify, what I mean is I''m not saying 200k item should not be better than a 10k item. I'm saying that you can't accurately compare Event Coin items to iTunes/ Reward items/ Auction items & so because you can't accurately judge it, best thing is for all to be nerfed the same. That is the hierarchies should be kept in place each retaining its unique features, none given favouritism treatment like for example Ion being nerfed from being M4a3 level to near Vector level the hierchacies still remain but M4A3 is not nerfed as much because you thinks its not 'free' like Ion.