Quote Originally Posted by Donald View Post
My views aren't one sided if you actually bother reading the thread & peoples review you'd actually know that. Doesn't matter if the guns are still better than the cheaper guns facts is they aren't as fun to use. Sure we could adapt but its a matter of taste. We just don't like the slow paced firing style.
You're just imposing the your own personal preference to playing the game on everyone else.
Even if people say they don't like the changes even if the afk noobs are still afking you still stand by your decision not because its the right decision but because its how you'd prefer & you think people should play the game rather than what people actually want in the game.

- - - Updated - - -

These are some of the gun descriptions according to you we bought the gun for its descriptions & the descriptions is what we still have.

Candy Bazooka
This is a Candy. The Candy shoots an explosive pink ball which on impact causes 7 damage and an explosion! The clip size is ten.

You changed the damage to 6 & the clip to 5.

Morano Thompson
The Morano Thompson shoots only one bullets and deals 8 damage. Its has a clip size of 20 and it''s an automatic. It doesn't have very good accuracy.

You changed the clip to 30 & you took away the auto despite what the description says.

G36 Tactical
The G36 Tactical is an assault rifle that has a working grenade launcher. It does 8 damage with low freeze and decent rate of fire. It also has 15 clip.

Again despite the descriptions stating it has 15 clip & decent firerate. You went & changed the clip to 23 & slowed down the firerate from 0.2875 to 0.325.

According to you if the stats are not in the description therefore you can do whatever you want. Well these stats are in the descriptions so i guess by your same logic they should not
be tampered with.

- - - Updated - - -

You keep saying that people who are happy with the changes don't go on the forums to voice their opinions.
Bitz I dare you to do a poll IN THE GAME like it pops up on their screen & everyone has to vote & I"'m confident you would still come up at the bottom.
We have probably maybe around 100 active registered users on ERA GO 40 of them voted it shows in the poll.
Could it be that most people just don't like the changes even after giving the guns a chance have you ever considered that??

How about you just make a spar room in the main area that only people using guns that cost under 100k can fire?
People with top guns will still be a contest of skill because they're using the same guns.
Theres more than one way to skin a cat no point pissing everyone off if what you say is really what people want then make it an option & let the people decide rather than decide in an authoritarian way that everyone has to follow.
That way people with the 100k + gun can still compete against each other & people with guns costing under 100k can compete & be the best in their gun level.
Think of it as like boxing theres heavy weight welter weight light weight & you just compete in your division.
Same with basing theres a lot more spaces left maybe create 2 new bases where only people with guns costing under 100k can fire.
There will still be other bases & spar rooms where top & mid tier guns can compete against each other but this way its a choice.


Actually, the Thompson is still auto, I should know, I have it.
It's much slower than it was, but if you get the taps in right, it gets the job done.
Clip size isn't bad either, I actually love the clip size. The lack of accuracy gets some good shots in too.
Don't get me wrong, the gun nerfs aren't great (and personally I totally disagree with the ACR buff), but some of these only make sense because of weapon patriarchy, and the slow-paced way these guns are shooting is just weird, but maybe that's because it's going to take some time to get used to.
I don't like it, but I understand why it's needed, and I respect that.

On a side note though; that ACR buff is plain crazy, but I'll live.