Incentive ideas?

[LYK08]

I don?t appreciate you suggesting I?m treating respondents that way. In every single response I?ve written, including to yours, and not sarcastically, I?ve said thank you in some shape or form. I?m allowed to disagree with some responses but I?m accepting them nonetheless.

What I said in response to your post wasn?t bashing what you said, or disregarding it. I simply disagreed with some things, and agreed with others. I?m sorry you feel I?m inferior and disgusting to you, in no way did I mean to be such.

And I?m not trying to solve world peace. All I want is some garnered ideas on finding ways to encourage better behavior. I said ?I appreciate all responses nonetheless? in most recent post. I don?t disregard anything, and that assumption is insulting.

But you?re steering this off topic. If you want to argue over a respectful response, although you seem to think I?m being malicious, please privately contact me, and tell me what I said that you found as insulting as you did. Otherwise, I?m allowed to not agree but I always appreciate and think about the responses I get.

Thanks.

- - - Updated - - -



Thanks for the response and I understand what you?re saying. But in no shape or form is sending death threats, and being racist something that should be allowed and accepted as ?okay?. It?s not about growing thick skin because you have to realize every single person has different history and culture and handles things differently. A block may stop it but it can still bother someone. Someone is rude or annoying? Fine. But when someone is threatening, racist, and extremely over the top, they will be punished, and their freedom of speech will be limited as a result. It?s just how it is.

I was talking to someone about my disabled brother who is currently sick in the hospital with a friend, and someone decided to curse out me and my brother, saying he deserved to die. That?s a sensitive thing for me, like you?d never know, and I?m supposed to walk away like nothing happened? Maybe you can, I can't though. Even though I could?ve said it privately, that?s MY freedom of speech and that puts that persons horrendous actions on me.

Nonetheless, I do agree we shouldn?t limit all speech or something like that. I?m talking about extremes. Not curse words without direction and annoyances. The game is more diverse now, and with that needs change; if someone says things like that it can?t be accepted, hollow or not. I do see what you are saying though.

We have to keep in mind that even though ?words have as much power as you give them?, you have to be soulless to have absolutely nothing that is said to you affecting you.

- - - Updated - - -

Please keep this thread on topic, I don?t want it being closed. Thanks

Well yes, you said you wanted ideas to improve the community and I was telling you straight the following
1. The administration needs to change for ideas generated in the first place to work. (it's a fact to accept, is it that hard?)

2. Why some players choose to behave as what you said so that you can better understand what you're dealing with (but as you said u have difficulties taking it seriously, so this is just disregarding what I've mentioned, which I am obviously unhappy with because you asked for responses and I'm providing you with some)

3. You didnt make much emphasis on "death threats" in your first post. Who'd know you'd be referring to that?

I honestly don't know what's with the accusations and how has it got to do with incentive ideas in the first place. And I don't have a problem with you, which is why my first post was kept entirely neutral with no personal attacks whatsoever. And I didn't expect you to take offense with my first post.

You can obviously disagree with the admin part, but I think acknowledging that the current administration needs to change is prerequisite for any ideas generated to work in the first place. Case in point - the player count has fallen from 3-4k to 1-2k under the current administration and I think that goes to show a lot. Not that I'm hating the administration but I think we need to come to terms that this administration is not likely to make your ideas work.


Out of goodwill I'm helping by giving a response which you can obviously disagree with, but that doesn't make the intention less of a good one. So much for that.

Sent from my A37f using Tapatalk